From the resolution:
From the rationale (emphasis in original):“the ASCSU requests that the Chancellor clearly articulate, in the written response to this resolution, how the principle of “shared leadership” – to which he has often referred – either conforms with, or differs from, both the HEERA statute and the ‘long-accepted manner’ of shared governance as defined in the American Association of University Professors’ (AAUP’s) ‘Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities’.”
"Like his predecessor in the office, the current Chancellor has demonstrated a distinctly different understanding of shared governance from that which has characterized the principles and practice of the ASCSU.
"requests from campus faculty leaders for investigations by the Chancellor into the erosion of shared governance on individual campuses have been met, at times, with tepid responses."
"In contrast to the universally accepted principle of shared governance, “shared leadership” itself is a concept not native to academe but rather to business settings.
"In matters related to curriculum, in particular (though certainly not limited to curricular matters), there is growing evidence that the expertise of the faculty, and, in fact, faculty’s responsibility to preserve quality, is being threatened, not only from without but also from within."ASCSU Resolution Reaffirming the Principle of Shared Governance, approved unanimously, March 3-4, 2016.